Search Results

Liked our Work? Search it now on IndoPacific.App Get Searching Our Research Know more about our Knowledge Base, years of accumulated and developed in-house research at Indic Pacific Legal Research. Search our Research Treasure on IndoPacific.App. :) Regulatory Sandboxes for Artificial Intelligence: Techno-Legal Approaches for India [ISAIL-TR-002] Get this Publication 2022 ISBN 978-81-957087-4-1 Author(s) Manohar Samal, Poulomi Chatterjee Editor(s) Not Applicable IndoPacific.App Identifier (ID) ISAIL-TR-002 Tags Artificial Intelligence, Data Science, Governance, India, Innovation, Legal Studies, Policy, Regulatory Sandboxes, Techno-Legal Approaches, Technology Related Terms in Techindata.in Explainers Definitions - A - E AI as a Concept AI as an Object AI as a Subject AI as a Third Party AI Explainability Clause Accountability Definitions - F - J Framework Fatigue General intelligence applications with multiple short-run or unclear use cases as per industrial and regulatory standards (GI2) General intelligence applications with multiple stable use cases as per relevant industrial and regulatory standards (GI1) Generative AI applications with a collection of standalone use cases related to one another (GAI2) Intended Purpose / Specified Purpose Definitions - K - P Language Model Manifest Availability Model Algorithmic Ethics standards (MAES) Multivariant, Fungible & Disruptive Use Cases & Test Cases of Generative AI Object-Oriented Design Proprietary Information Definitions - Q - U Roughdraft AI SOTP Classification Synthetic Content Technical concept classifcation Technology by Default Technology by Design Technology Distancing Technology Transfer Technophobia Definitions - V - Z WANA WENA Whole-of-Government Response Related Articles in Techindata.in Insights 29 Insight(s) on AI Ethics 8 Insight(s) on AI and Copyright Law 7 Insight(s) on AI and Competition Law 7 Insight(s) on AI and media sciences 7 Insight(s) on AI regulation 5 Insight(s) on AI Governance 3 Insight(s) on AI and Evidence Law 3 Insight(s) on AI literacy 2 Insight(s) on Abhivardhan 2 Insight(s) on AI and Intellectual Property Law 1 Insight(s) on AI and Securities Law 1 Insight(s) on Algorithmic Trading . Previous Item Next Item

Algorithmic Activities and Operations Explainers The Complete Glossary Algorithmic Activities and Operations Date of Addition 26 Apr 2024 It refers to the dual functional capacities of algorithms within AI systems or machine-learning frameworks, as understood within a procedural and legal context. Activities encompass the routine, foundational, and general-purpose tasks that algorithms perform, such as data processing, pattern recognition, or automated responses, which are essential for the day-to-day functioning of digital systems across diverse applications. Operations, in contrast, denote specialised, context-driven, or technology-specific tasks that are tailored to particular domains, objectives, or technical environments, such as predictive modelling for financial markets, real-time decision-making in autonomous systems, or adaptive learning in personalised healthcare solutions, for instance. This distinction highlights the layered complexity of algorithmic behaviour, recognising that algorithms operate at varying levels of abstraction and intent, necessitating nuanced governance approaches in a globalised digital ecosystem. This idea was originally proposed in Deciphering Artificial Intelligence Hype and its Legal-Economic Risks, VLiGTA-TR-001 (2022). Original Definition in line with technical report "Deciphering Artificial Intelligence Hype and its Legal-Economic Risks, VLiGTA-TR-001 (2022)": It means the algorithms of any AI system or machine-learning-based system are capable to perform two kinds of tasks, in a procedural sense of law, i.e., performing normal and ordinary tasks - which could be referred to as 'activities' and methodical and context-specific or technology-specific tasks, called 'operations'. Related Long-form Insights on IndoPacific.App Regularizing Artificial Intelligence Ethics in the Indo-Pacific [GLA-TR-002] Learn More Deciphering Artificial Intelligence Hype and its Legal-Economic Risks [VLiGTA-TR-001] Learn More Artificial Intelligence and Policy in India, Volume 4 [AIPI-V4] Learn More Artificial Intelligence and Policy in India, Volume 5 [AIPI-V5] Learn More Legal-Economic Issues in Indian AI Compute and Infrastructure, IPLR-IG-011 Learn More Artificial Intelligence and Policy in India, Volume 6 [AIPI-V6] Learn More Previous Term Next Term terms of use This glossary of terms is provided as a free resource for educational and informational purposes only. By using this glossary developed by Indic Pacific Legal Research LLP (referred to as 'The Firm'), you agree to the following terms of use: You may use the glossary for personal and non-commercial purposes only. If you use any content from the glossary of terms on this website in your own work, you must properly attribute the source. This means including a link to this website and citing the title of the glossary. Here is a sample format to cite this glossary (we have used the OSCOLA citation format as an example): Indic Pacific Legal Research LLP, 'TechinData.in Explainers' (Indic Pacific Legal Research , 2023) You are not authorised to reproduce, distribute, or modify the glossary without the express written permission of a representative of Indic Pacific Legal Research. The Firm makes no representations or warranties about the accuracy or completeness of the glossary. The glossary is provided on an "as is" basis and the Firm disclaims all liability for any errors or omissions in the glossary. You agree to indemnify and hold the Firm harmless from any claims or damages arising out of your use of the glossary. If you have any questions or concerns about these terms of use, please contact us at global@indicpacific.com

Liked our Work? Search it now on IndoPacific.App Get Searching Our Research Know more about our Knowledge Base, years of accumulated and developed in-house research at Indic Pacific Legal Research. Search our Research Treasure on IndoPacific.App. :) Auditing AI Companies for Corporate Internal Investigations in India, VLiGTA-TR-005 Get this Publication 2023 ISBN 978-81-959932-5-3 Author(s) Abhivardhan, Akash Manwani Editor(s) Not Applicable IndoPacific.App Identifier (ID) VLiGTA-TR-005 Tags Abhivardhan, Artificial Intelligence and Law, Artificial Intelligence and Policy in India, EU AI Act, European regulation, India AI, Indo-Pacific, Western Europe and North America Related Terms in Techindata.in Explainers Definitions - A - E AI as a Concept AI as an Object AI as a Subject AI as a Third Party AI Explainability Clause Accountability Data-related Definitions in DPDPA Definitions - F - J General intelligence applications with multiple short-run or unclear use cases as per industrial and regulatory standards (GI2) General intelligence applications with multiple stable use cases as per relevant industrial and regulatory standards (GI1) Generative AI applications with one standalone use case (GAI1) In-context Learning Inference Latency Intended Purpose / Specified Purpose Definitions - K - P Language Model Manifest Availability Model Algorithmic Ethics standards (MAES) Multivariant, Fungible & Disruptive Use Cases & Test Cases of Generative AI Object-Oriented Design Proprietary Information Definitions - Q - U Roughdraft AI SOTP Classification Synthetic Content Technical concept classifcation Techno-Legal Measures (DPDP Rules + DPDPA) Technology by Default Technology by Design Technology Distancing Technology Transfer Technophobia Definitions - V - Z Whole-of-Government Response Related Articles in Techindata.in Insights 29 Insight(s) on AI Ethics 8 Insight(s) on AI and Copyright Law 7 Insight(s) on AI and Competition Law 7 Insight(s) on AI and media sciences 7 Insight(s) on AI regulation 5 Insight(s) on AI Governance 3 Insight(s) on AI and Evidence Law 3 Insight(s) on AI literacy 2 Insight(s) on Abhivardhan 2 Insight(s) on AI and Intellectual Property Law 1 Insight(s) on AI and Securities Law 1 Insight(s) on Algorithmic Trading . Previous Item Next Item

CEI Classification Explainers The Complete Glossary CEI Classification Date of Addition 26 Apr 2024 This is one of the two Classification Methods in which Artificial Intelligence could be recognised as a Concept, an Entity, or an Industry. This idea was proposed in the 2020 Handbook on AI and International Law (2021). Related Long-form Insights on IndoPacific.App Global Customary International Law Index: A Prologue [GLA-TR-00X] Learn More Regularizing Artificial Intelligence Ethics in the Indo-Pacific [GLA-TR-002] Learn More An Indian Perspective on Special Purpose Acquisition Companies [GLA-TR-001] Learn More India-led Global Governance in the Indo-Pacific: Basis & Approaches [GLA-TR-003] Learn More Global Legalism, Volume 1 Learn More Global Relations and Legal Policy, Volume 1 [GRLP1] Learn More South Asian Review of International Law, Volume 1 Learn More Indian International Law Series, Volume 1 Learn More Global Relations and Legal Policy, Volume 2 Learn More The Policy Purpose of a Multipolar Agenda for India, First Edition, 2023 Learn More Artificial Intelligence and Policy in India, Volume 4 [AIPI-V4] Learn More Normative Emergence in Cyber Geographies: International Algorithmic Law in a Multipolar Technological Order, First Edition Learn More Artificial Intelligence and Policy in India, Volume 6 [AIPI-V6] Learn More Previous Term Next Term terms of use This glossary of terms is provided as a free resource for educational and informational purposes only. By using this glossary developed by Indic Pacific Legal Research LLP (referred to as 'The Firm'), you agree to the following terms of use: You may use the glossary for personal and non-commercial purposes only. If you use any content from the glossary of terms on this website in your own work, you must properly attribute the source. This means including a link to this website and citing the title of the glossary. Here is a sample format to cite this glossary (we have used the OSCOLA citation format as an example): Indic Pacific Legal Research LLP, 'TechinData.in Explainers' (Indic Pacific Legal Research , 2023) You are not authorised to reproduce, distribute, or modify the glossary without the express written permission of a representative of Indic Pacific Legal Research. The Firm makes no representations or warranties about the accuracy or completeness of the glossary. The glossary is provided on an "as is" basis and the Firm disclaims all liability for any errors or omissions in the glossary. You agree to indemnify and hold the Firm harmless from any claims or damages arising out of your use of the glossary. If you have any questions or concerns about these terms of use, please contact us at global@indicpacific.com

Issued in October 2025 by the Assistant Director (MSU) with approval of the Director General, ESIC. This circular directs all ESIC employees to refrain from using open or external AI tools such as ChatGPT, DeepSeek, Copilot, Midjourney, DALL-E, Jasper, and Adobe Firefly for official noting, drafting, or data analysis. The circular cites significant risks to data security and leakage of sensitive information related to stakeholders. India AI Regulation Landscape 101 This is a simple regulatory tracker consisting all information on how India is regulating artificial intelligence as a technology, inspired from a seminal paper authored by Abhivardhan and Deepanshu Singh for the Forum of Federations, Canada, entitled, "Government with Algorithms: Managing AI in India’s Federal System – Number 70 ". We have also included case laws along with regulatory / governance documents, and avoided adding any industry documents or policy papers which do not reflect any direct or implicit legal impact. Circular on Use of Open/External Artificial Intelligence (AI) Tools for Official Work, File No. Z-11/12/1/Misc.Matter/2024-MSU Issued in October 2025 by the Assistant Director (MSU) with approval of the Director General, ESIC. This circular directs all ESIC employees to refrain from using open or external AI tools such as ChatGPT, DeepSeek, Copilot, Midjourney, DALL-E, Jasper, and Adobe Firefly for official noting, drafting, or data analysis. The circular cites significant risks to data security and leakage of sensitive information related to stakeholders. Previous Next October 2025 Issuing Authority Employees' State Insurance Corporation (ESIC), Ministry of Labour and Employment Type of Legal / Policy Document Executive Instruments - Administrative Decisions Status In Force Regulatory Stage Regulatory Binding Value Legally binding instruments enforceable before courts Read the Document AI Regulation Visualisation Related Long-form Insights on IndoPacific.App Reimaging and Restructuring MeiTY for India [IPLR-IG-007] Learn More Averting Framework Fatigue in AI Governance [IPLR-IG-013] Learn More Decoding the AI Competency Triad for Public Officials [IPLR-IG-014] Learn More AI Bias & the Overlap of AI Diplomacy and Governance Ethics Dilemmas Learn More Artificial Intelligence, Market Power and India in a Multipolar World Learn More Related draft AI Law Provisions of aiact.in Section 15 – Guidance Principles for AI-related Agreements Section 15 – Guidance Principles for AI-related Agreements Section 16 – Guidance Principles for AI-related Corporate Governance Section 16 – Guidance Principles for AI-related Corporate Governance

Omnipotence Date of Addition 26 April 2024 In the context of Artificial Intelligence, this implies that any AI system, due to its inherent yet limited features of processing and generating outputs, could be effective in shaping multiple sectors, eventualities and legal dilemmas. In short, any omnipotent AI system could have first, second & third order effects due to its actions. This was discussed in Artificial Intelligence Ethics and International Law (originally published in 2019), Regulatory Sovereignty in India: Indigenizing Competition- Technology Approaches, ISAIL-TR-001 (2021), Deciphering Regulative Methods for Generative AI, VLiGTA-TR-002 (2023) and many key publications by ISAIL & VLiGTA . Related Long-form Insights on IndoPacific.App 2021 Handbook on AI and International Law [RHB 2021 ISAIL] Learn More Draft Digital Competition Bill, 2024 for India: Feedback Report [IPLR-IG-003] Learn More The Indic Approach to Artificial Intelligence Policy [IPLR-IG-006] Learn More Reimaging and Restructuring MeiTY for India [IPLR-IG-007] Learn More Averting Framework Fatigue in AI Governance [IPLR-IG-013] Learn More Normative Emergence in Cyber Geographies: International Algorithmic Law in a Multipolar Technological Order, First Edition Learn More AI Bias & the Overlap of AI Diplomacy and Governance Ethics Dilemmas Learn More 2020 Handbook on AI and International Law [RHB 2020 ISAIL] Learn More Previous Term Next Term Explainers The Complete Glossary terms of use This glossary of terms is provided as a free resource for educational and informational purposes only. By using this glossary developed by Indic Pacific Legal Research LLP (referred to as 'The Firm'), you agree to the following terms of use: You may use the glossary for personal and non-commercial purposes only. If you use any content from the glossary of terms on this website in your own work, you must properly attribute the source. This means including a link to this website and citing the title of the glossary. Here is a sample format to cite this glossary (we have used the OSCOLA citation format as an example): Indic Pacific Legal Research LLP, 'TechinData.in Explainers' (Indic Pacific Legal Research , 2023) You are not authorised to reproduce, distribute, or modify the glossary without the express written permission of a representative of Indic Pacific Legal Research. The Firm makes no representations or warranties about the accuracy or completeness of the glossary. The glossary is provided on an "as is" basis and the Firm disclaims all liability for any errors or omissions in the glossary. You agree to indemnify and hold the Firm harmless from any claims or damages arising out of your use of the glossary. If you have any questions or concerns about these terms of use, please contact us at global@indicpacific.com

Notified on April 6, 2023, these amendments introduced provisions specifically targeting AI-generated misinformation and online gaming regulation. Key provisions include prohibition of harmful unapproved online games, mandatory takedown of content identified as fake or misleading by government fact-check units, and registration requirements with Self-Regulatory Bodies (SRBs) for online gaming platforms. The amendments also addressed deepfakes as AI-powered misinformation under the prohibited content categories. Non-compliance results in loss of safe harbor protection for intermediaries. The status is in force as amended regulatory framework. India AI Regulation Landscape 101 This is a simple regulatory tracker consisting all information on how India is regulating artificial intelligence as a technology, inspired from a seminal paper authored by Abhivardhan and Deepanshu Singh for the Forum of Federations, Canada, entitled, "Government with Algorithms: Managing AI in India’s Federal System – Number 70 ". We have also included case laws along with regulatory / governance documents, and avoided adding any industry documents or policy papers which do not reflect any direct or implicit legal impact. Information Technology (Intermediary Guidelines and Digital Media Ethics Code) Amendment Rules, 2023 (IT Amendment Rules 2023) Notified on April 6, 2023, these amendments introduced provisions specifically targeting AI-generated misinformation and online gaming regulation. Key provisions include prohibition of harmful unapproved online games, mandatory takedown of content identified as fake or misleading by government fact-check units, and registration requirements with Self-Regulatory Bodies (SRBs) for online gaming platforms. The amendments also addressed deepfakes as AI-powered misinformation under the prohibited content categories. Non-compliance results in loss of safe harbor protection for intermediaries. The status is in force as amended regulatory framework. Previous Next April 2023 Issuing Authority Ministry of Electronics and Information Technology (MeitY) Type of Legal / Policy Document Secondary Legislation Status In Force Regulatory Stage Regulatory Binding Value Legally binding instruments enforceable before courts Read the Document AI Regulation Visualisation Related Long-form Insights on IndoPacific.App Artificial Intelligence and Policy in India, Volume 4 [AIPI-V4] Learn More AIACT.IN Version 3 Quick Explainer Learn More Reimaging and Restructuring MeiTY for India [IPLR-IG-007] Learn More Artificial Intelligence and Policy in India, Volume 5 [AIPI-V5] Learn More Averting Framework Fatigue in AI Governance [IPLR-IG-013] Learn More Reckoning the Viability of Safe Harbour in Technology Law, IPLR-IG-015 Learn More Artificial Intelligence and Policy in India, Volume 6 [AIPI-V6] Learn More Artificial Intelligence, Market Power and India in a Multipolar World Learn More Related draft AI Law Provisions of aiact.in Section 15 – Guidance Principles for AI-related Agreements Section 15 – Guidance Principles for AI-related Agreements Section 16 – Guidance Principles for AI-related Corporate Governance Section 16 – Guidance Principles for AI-related Corporate Governance Section 18 – Third-Party Vulnerability Reporting Section 18 – Third-Party Vulnerability Reporting Section 19 – Incident Reporting and Mitigation Protocols Section 19 – Incident Reporting and Mitigation Protocols

Section 33 – Savings Clause PUBLISHED Previous Next Section 33 - Savings Clause (1) The provisions of this Act shall be in addition to, and not in derogation of, the provisions of any other law for the time being in force. (2) Nothing in this Act shall affect the validity of any action taken or decision made by any entity in relation to the development, deployment, or use of AI systems prior to the commencement of this Act, provided such action or decision was in accordance with the laws in force at that time. (3) Any investigation, legal proceeding, or remedy in respect of any right, privilege, obligation, liability, penalty, or punishment under any law, initiated or arising before the commencement of this Act, shall be continued, enforced, or imposed as if this Act had not been enacted. (4) Nothing in this Act shall be construed as preventing the Central Government from making any rules or regulations, or taking any action, which it considers necessary for the purpose of removing any difficulty that may arise in giving effect to the provisions of this Act. Related Indian AI Regulation Sources

Bombay High Court March 2025 interim order protecting filmmaker's personality rights against unauthorized name use in film title "Shaadi Ke Director Karan Aur Johar." India AI Regulation Landscape 101 This is a simple regulatory tracker consisting all information on how India is regulating artificial intelligence as a technology, inspired from a seminal paper authored by Abhivardhan and Deepanshu Singh for the Forum of Federations, Canada, entitled, "Government with Algorithms: Managing AI in India’s Federal System – Number 70 ". We have also included case laws along with regulatory / governance documents, and avoided adding any industry documents or policy papers which do not reflect any direct or implicit legal impact. Karan Johar v. India Pride Advisory Private Ltd. & Ors. ("Shaadi Ke Director Karan Aur Johar"), COM IPR Suit (L.) No. 17863/2024, Bombay High Court, Order dated March 7, 2025 Bombay High Court March 2025 interim order protecting filmmaker's personality rights against unauthorized name use in film title "Shaadi Ke Director Karan Aur Johar." Previous Next March 2025 Issuing Authority Bombay High Court Type of Legal / Policy Document Judicial Pronouncements - National Court Precedents Status In Force Regulatory Stage Regulatory Binding Value Legally binding instruments enforceable before courts Read the Document AI Regulation Visualisation Related Long-form Insights on IndoPacific.App Regularizing Artificial Intelligence Ethics in the Indo-Pacific [GLA-TR-002] Learn More Impact-Based Legal Problems around Generative AI in Publishing, IPLR-IG-010 Learn More Indo-Pacific Research Ethics Framework on Artificial Intelligence Use [IPac AI] Learn More The Global AI Inventorship Handbook, First Edition [RHB-AI-INVENT-001-2025] Learn More Related draft AI Law Provisions of aiact.in Section 21 – Intellectual Property Protections Section 21 – Intellectual Property Protections Section 23 – Content Provenance and Identification Section 23 – Content Provenance and Identification

Section 26 – Appeal to Appellate Tribunal PUBLISHED Previous Next Section 26 – Appeal to Appellate Tribunal (1) The Appellate Tribunal established under the Telecom Regulatory Authority of India Act, 1997, shall also serve as the Appellate Tribunal for the purposes of this Act. (2) Any person aggrieved by any direction, decision, or order of the IAIC under this Act may prefer an appeal to the Appellate Tribunal within a period of 60 days from the date on which a copy of the direction, decision, or order is received by the person. (3) The Appellate Tribunal may entertain an appeal after the expiry of the said period of 60 days if it is satisfied that there was sufficient cause for not filing it within that period. (4) On receipt of an appeal, the Appellate Tribunal may, after giving the parties to the appeal an opportunity of being heard, pass such orders thereon as it thinks fit, confirming, modifying, or setting aside the direction, decision, or order appealed against. (5) The Appellate Tribunal shall send a copy of every order made by it to the parties to the appeal and to the IAIC. (6) The appeal filed before the Appellate Tribunal shall be dealt with by it as expeditiously as possible, and endeavour shall be made by it to dispose of the appeal finally within 6 months from the date of receipt of the appeal. (7) The Appellate Tribunal may, for the purpose of examining the legality, propriety, or correctness of any direction, decision, or order of the IAIC, on its own motion or otherwise, call for the records relevant to disposing of such appeal and make such orders as it thinks fit. (8) The provisions of sections 14-I to 14K of the Telecom Regulatory Authority of India Act, 1997, shall, mutatis mutandis, apply to the Appellate Tribunal in the discharge of its functions under this Act, as they apply to it in the discharge of its functions under that Act. (9) Any person aggrieved by any decision or order of the Appellate Tribunal may file an appeal to the Supreme Court within a period of 60 days from the date of communication of the decision or order of the Appellate Tribunal. (10) The Appellate Tribunal shall endeavour to function as a digital office to the extent practicable, with the filing of appeals, hearings, and pronouncement of orders being conducted through digital means. Related Indian AI Regulation Sources

Section 29 – Power to Make Rules PUBLISHED Previous Next Section 29 - Power to Make Rules (1) The Central Government may, by notification, make rules to carry out the provisions of this Act. (2) In particular, and without prejudice to the generality of the foregoing power, such rules may provide for all or any of the following matters, namely:— (a) The manner of appointment, qualifications, terms and conditions of service of the Chairperson and Members of the IAIC under sub-section (6) of Section 10; (b) The form, manner, and fee for filing an appeal before the Appellate Tribunal under Section sub-section (2) of Section 26; (c) The procedure to be followed by the Appellate Tribunal while dealing with an appeal under the sub-section (8) of Section 26; (d) Any other matter which is required to be, or may be, prescribed, or in respect of which provision is to be made by rules. (3) Every rule made under this Act shall be laid, as soon as may be after it is made, before each House of Parliament, while it is in session, for a total period of thirty days which may be comprised in one session or in two or more successive sessions, and if, before the expiry of the session immediately following the session or the successive sessions aforesaid, both Houses agree in making any modification in the rule or both Houses agree that the rule should not be made, the rule shall thereafter have effect only in such modified form or be of no effect, as the case may be; so, however, that any such modification or annulment shall be without prejudice to the validity of anything previously done under that rule. Related Indian AI Regulation Sources Information Technology Act, 2000 (IT Act 2000) October 2000

MeitY's January 2025 draft implementing regulations operationalizing DPDP Act 2023 provisions through detailed compliance procedures. India AI Regulation Landscape 101 This is a simple regulatory tracker consisting all information on how India is regulating artificial intelligence as a technology, inspired from a seminal paper authored by Abhivardhan and Deepanshu Singh for the Forum of Federations, Canada, entitled, "Government with Algorithms: Managing AI in India’s Federal System – Number 70 ". We have also included case laws along with regulatory / governance documents, and avoided adding any industry documents or policy papers which do not reflect any direct or implicit legal impact. Draft Digital Personal Data Protection Rules, 2025 (DPDP Rules) MeitY's January 2025 draft implementing regulations operationalizing DPDP Act 2023 provisions through detailed compliance procedures. Previous Next January 2025 Issuing Authority Ministry of Electronics and Information Technology (MeitY) Type of Legal / Policy Document Secondary Legislation Status Proposed Regulatory Stage Pre-regulatory Binding Value Legally binding instruments enforceable before courts Read the Document AI Regulation Visualisation Related Long-form Insights on IndoPacific.App Reimaging and Restructuring MeiTY for India [IPLR-IG-007] Learn More Averting Framework Fatigue in AI Governance [IPLR-IG-013] Learn More Decoding the AI Competency Triad for Public Officials [IPLR-IG-014] Learn More AI Bias & the Overlap of AI Diplomacy and Governance Ethics Dilemmas Learn More Artificial Intelligence, Market Power and India in a Multipolar World Learn More Related draft AI Law Provisions of aiact.in Section 2 – Definitions Section 2 – Definitions Section 18 – Third-Party Vulnerability Reporting Section 18 – Third-Party Vulnerability Reporting Section 19 – Incident Reporting and Mitigation Protocols Section 19 – Incident Reporting and Mitigation Protocols Section 20 – Responsible Information Sharing Section 20 – Responsible Information Sharing