top of page
VLA.digital symbol 2025.png

India's Premier AI & Law-Policy Publication, explaining idea in graphics

Celebrating our 3-year legacy

Subscribe to our newsletter

Write a
Title Here

I'm a paragraph. Click here to add your own text and edit me. I’m a great place for you to tell a story and let your users know a little more about you.

© Indic Pacific Legal Research LLP. 

The works published on this website are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International.

For articles published in VISUAL LEGAL ANALYTICA, you may refer to the editorial guidelines for more information.

The Uttar Pradesh Government has a "deregulation cell" and that's a Good Thing for Indian Tech Policy and E-Governance

Ending this week with something very interesting that the Uttar Pradesh Government is doing.


As reported by the Times of India, the Government of Uttar Pradesh has a deregulation cell at a cabinet secretariat level that's driving a fascinating approach to e-governance reform 🚀


ree

Why this matters for tech policy & governance


  • 🔧 Systematic Deregulation: Rather than ad-hoc policy changes, UP has created a dedicated institutional mechanism - a "deregulation cell" - that's methodically reviewing and eliminating regulatory bottlenecks across 45 departments.

  • 📊 Data-Driven Results: They've implemented 4,675+ reforms including 2,500+ business-centric changes and are targeting 30% reduction in service delivery timelines through their upgraded Nivesh Mitra 3.0 platform.

  • ⚡ Digital-First Mindset: The integration of 525+ services across 44 departments into a single digital window shows how technology can be the backbone of regulatory simplification, not just an add-on.

  • 🎯 Bold Decriminalisation: Two landmark bills aim to eliminate 98% of imprisonment clauses in state laws - showing how tech-enabled governance can move from punitive to facilitative.


The bigger picture?


This isn't just about business ease - it's a template for how state governments can use institutional innovation (deregulation cells) + technology platforms (integrated service delivery) to fundamentally rethink the citizen-state interface 💡


What's fascinating is how UP's approach mirrors sophisticated tech policy frameworks we've analysed at Indic Pacific Legal Research 🔍 such as:



2️⃣ IPLR-IG-015 report on "Safe Harbour in Technology Law" 📊, focusing on institutional capacity: https://indopacific.app/product/reckoning-the-viability-of-safe-harbour-in-technology-law-iplr-ig-015/


3️⃣ Reducing regulatory burden as emphasised in IPLR-IG-007 report on "Restructuring MeitY for India" 🇮🇳, through institutional restructuring rather than piecemeal reforms 🔧: https://indopacific.app/product/reimaging-and-restructuring-meity-for-india-iplr-ig-007/


4️⃣ For those interested in deeper policy architecture thinking 🏗️, do read "The Indic Approach to Artificial Intelligence Policy" (IPLR-IG-006) 🤖: https://indopacific.app/product/the-indic-approach-to-artificial-intelligence-policy-iplr-ig-006/


The real insight is that deregulation as systematic policy engineering 🛠️ - not political rhetoric, but institutional capability building 💪.


That's scalable governance innovation worth studying! 🔧


In fact, Deepanshu Singh and I are working on a very interesting work, on which we will spill some beans later. Have an awesome weekend anyways!

Comments


bottom of page