top of page

Gammon–OJSC Mosmetrostroy JV and Chennai Metro Rail Limited (CMRL)

The Madras High Court became the first Indian court to formally allow an AI-assisted tool (called "Superlaw Courts") to be used during active proceedings to analyze heavy arbitral records. The judge strictly demarcated the AI's role: it can organize, search, and summarize documents, but it is prohibited from drawing legal inferences or expressing legal opinions.

The AIACT.IN India AI Regulation Tracker

This is a simple regulatory tracker consisting all information on how India is regulating artificial intelligence as a technology, inspired from a seminal paper authored by Abhivardhan and Deepanshu Singh for the Forum of Federations, Canada, entitled, "Government with Algorithms: Managing AI in India’s Federal System – Number 70".

We have also included case laws along with regulatory / governance documents, and avoided adding any industry documents or policy papers which do not reflect any direct or implicit legal impact.

Cover-Page-OPS-70.png

January 2026

Issuing Authority

Madras High Court

Type of Legal / Policy Document

Judicial Pronouncements - National Court Precedents

Status

Enacted

Regulatory Stage

Regulatory

Binding Value

Legally binding instruments enforceable before courts

Related Long-form Insights on IndoPacific.App

The LegalTechPolicy.com Playbook, First Edition

Averting Framework Fatigue in AI Governance [IPLR-IG-013]

Indo-Pacific Research Ethics Framework on Artificial Intelligence Use [IPac AI]

The Global AI Inventorship Handbook, First Edition [RHB-AI-INVENT-001-2025]

Artificial Intelligence, Market Power and India in a Multipolar World

Related draft AI Law Provisions of aiact.in

Section 3 – Classification of Artificial Intelligence

Section 14 – Model Standards on Knowledge Management

Section 15 – Guidance Principles for AI-related Agreements

Section 21 – Intellectual Property Protections

bottom of page