top of page

Section 21 – Intellectual Property Protections

PUBLISHED

Section 21 - Intellectual Property Protections

(1) In recognition of the unique challenges and opportunities presented by the development and use of artificial intelligence systems, AI systems must be protected through a combination of existing intellectual property (IP) rights, such as copyright, patents, and design rights, as well as new and evolving IP concepts specifically tailored to address the spatial aspects of AI systems.


(2) For the purposes of this Section, “spatial aspects of AI systems” shall refer to the unique capabilities of AI technologies, including but not limited to:

(i) Dynamically adapting and generating novel outputs based on changing inputs, environments, and interactions;

(ii) Operating with varying levels of autonomy in decision-making, task execution, and self-learning;

(iii) Integrating and analysing data from multiple spatial, temporal, and contextual sources;

(iv) Enabling novel applications, services, and experiences leveraging spatial computing technologies.


(3) The objectives of providing a combination of existing intellectual property rights are to:

(i) Encourage innovation by securing enforceable rights for AI developers over their creations, inventions, and generated outputs;

(ii) Enhance interoperability by ensuring contractual arrangements are not unduly hindered by restrictive IP terms;

(iii) Promote fair competition by preventing unauthorized exploitation of AI-related IP assets developed in India;

(iv) Protect individual privacy and data rights by aligning IP protections with provisions under the Digital Personal Data Protection Act, 2023 and other data protection frameworks.


(4) The IAIC shall establish consultative mechanisms, in cooperation with relevant IP authorities and stakeholders, to develop a comprehensive framework for the identification, protection, and enforcement of intellectual property rights related to AI systems, including:

(i) Defining the scope and limitations of combined IP protections for AI systems and their spatial aspects;

(ii) Assessing the compatibility of such protections with existing IP laws and international treaties;

(iii) Addressing interoperability considerations to enable seamless integration and data exchange among AI systems;

(iv) Examining IP implications of AI systems’ ability to process, learn from, and generate content based on copyrighted works or patented inventions;

(v) Developing guidelines for determining authorship, inventorship, and ownership of AI-generated content and innovations;

(vi) Establishing protocols for rights management, licensing, and commercialisation of AI-related IP assets.


(5) The use of open-source software in AI systems shall be subject to the terms and conditions of the respective open-source licenses, with the IAIC providing guidance on compatibility between such licenses and the IP protections framework for AI systems.

(6) The IAIC shall periodically review and update the IP protections framework to accommodate advancements in AI technologies, evolving legal and regulatory landscapes, and emerging best practices in the field of AI and spatial computing.

Related Indian AI Regulation Sources

Mr. Shivaji Rao Gaikwad v. M/s. Varsha Productions ("Main Hoon Rajinikanth"), Civil Suit No. 598/2014, Madras High Court, Order dated February 3, 2015

Application No: L-9 Raghav Artificial Intelligence Painting App, Indian Copyright Office (Ankit Sahni & RAGHAV AI Copyright Registration)

Amitabh Bachchan v. Rajat Nagi & Ors., CS(COMM) 819/2022, Delhi High Court, Order dated November 25, 2022

Anil Kapoor v. Simply Life India & Ors., CS(COMM) 652/2023 and I.A. 18237/2023-18243/2023, Delhi High Court, Order dated September 20, 2023

Jaikishan Kakubhai Saraf (Jackie Shroff) v. The Peppy Store & Ors., 2024 DHC 4046, Delhi High Court, Order dated May 15, 2024

Arijit Singh v. Codible Ventures LLP & Ors., COM IPR SUIT (L) No. 23443 of 2024, Bombay High Court, Judgment dated July 26, 2024

Karan Johar v. India Pride Advisory Private Ltd. & Ors. ("Shaadi Ke Director Karan Aur Johar"), COM IPR Suit (L.) No. 17863/2024, Bombay High Court, Order dated March 7, 2025

Ravi Shankar v. John Doe(s) & Ors., CS(COMM) 889/2025, Delhi High Court, Order dated August 26, 2025

Abhishek Bachchan v. The Bollywood Tee Shop & Ors., CS(COMM) 960/2025, Delhi High Court, Order dated September 10, 2025

Aishwarya Rai Bachchan v. Aishwaryaworld.com & Ors., CS(COMM) 956/2025, Delhi High Court, Order dated September 9, 2025

Akkineni Nagarjuna v. www.bfxxx.org & Ors., CS(COMM) 1023/2025, Delhi High Court, Order dated September 25, 2025

Asha Bhosle v. Mayk Inc & Ors., COM IPR Suit (L) No. 30262/2025, Bombay High Court, Order dated September 29, 2025

Sudhir Chaudhary v. Meta Platforms Inc & Ors., CS(COMM) 1089/2025, Delhi High Court, Order dated October 10, 2025

Suniel V Shetty v. John Doe & Ashok Kumar, COM IP Suit (L) No. 32130/2025, Bombay High Court, Order dated October 10, 2025

Hrithik Roshan v. Ashok Kumar/John Doe & Ors., CS(COMM) 1107/2025, Delhi High Court, Order dated October 15, 2025

bottom of page