top of page

Search Results

Results found for empty search

  • Model Collapse | Glossary of Terms | Indic Pacific | IPLR

    Model Collapse Date of Addition 17 October 2025 A degenerative phenomenon where AI models trained on recursively generated synthetic data progressively lose diversity, accuracy, and quality over successive training iterations, ultimately producing increasingly homogeneous and corrupted outputs. This feedback loop occurs when models consume their own generated content or outputs from similar models as training data, causing statistical distributions to narrow and tail events to disappear from learned representations. Model collapse poses existential risks to the long-term viability of AI systems as synthetic content proliferates across the internet, contaminating datasets used for future model training. Related Long-form Insights on IndoPacific.App NIST Adversarial Machine Learning Taxonomies: Decoded, IPLR-IG-016 Learn More Previous Term Next Term The Indic Pacific Glossary The Complete Glossary terms of use This glossary of terms is provided as a free resource for educational and informational purposes only. By using this glossary developed by Indic Pacific Legal Research LLP (referred to as 'The Firm'), you agree to the following terms of use: You may use the glossary for personal and non-commercial purposes only. If you use any content from the glossary of terms on this website in your own work, you must properly attribute the source. This means including a link to this website and citing the title of the glossary. Here is a sample format to cite this glossary (we have used the OSCOLA citation format as an example): Indic Pacific Legal Research LLP, 'TechinData.in Explainers' (Indic Pacific Legal Research , 2023) You are not authorised to reproduce, distribute, or modify the glossary without the express written permission of a representative of Indic Pacific Legal Research. The Firm makes no representations or warranties about the accuracy or completeness of the glossary. The glossary is provided on an "as is" basis and the Firm disclaims all liability for any errors or omissions in the glossary. You agree to indemnify and hold the Firm harmless from any claims or damages arising out of your use of the glossary. If you have any questions or concerns about these terms of use, please contact us at global@indicpacific.com

  • General intelligence applications with multiple short-run or unclear use cases as per industrial and regulatory standards (GI2) | Glossary of Terms | Indic Pacific | IPLR

    General intelligence applications with multiple short-run or unclear use cases as per industrial and regulatory standards (GI2) The Indic Pacific Glossary The Complete Glossary terms of use This glossary of terms is provided as a free resource for educational and informational purposes only. By using this glossary developed by Indic Pacific Legal Research LLP (referred to as 'The Firm'), you agree to the following terms of use: You may use the glossary for personal and non-commercial purposes only. If you use any content from the glossary of terms on this website in your own work, you must properly attribute the source. This means including a link to this website and citing the title of the glossary. Here is a sample format to cite this glossary (we have used the OSCOLA citation format as an example): Indic Pacific Legal Research LLP, 'TechinData.in Explainers' (Indic Pacific Legal Research , 2023) You are not authorised to reproduce, distribute, or modify the glossary without the express written permission of a representative of Indic Pacific Legal Research. The Firm makes no representations or warranties about the accuracy or completeness of the glossary. The glossary is provided on an "as is" basis and the Firm disclaims all liability for any errors or omissions in the glossary. You agree to indemnify and hold the Firm harmless from any claims or damages arising out of your use of the glossary. If you have any questions or concerns about these terms of use, please contact us at global@indicpacific.com General intelligence applications with multiple short-run or unclear use cases as per industrial and regulatory standards (GI2) Date of Addition 26 April 2024 This is an ontological sub-category of Generative AI applications. Such kinds of Generative AI Applications are those which have a lot of test cases and use cases, which are either useful in a short-run or have unclear value as per industrial and regulatory standards. ChatGPT could be considered an example of this sub-category. This idea was proposed in Deciphering Regulative Methods for Generative AI, VLiGTA-TR-002 (2023). Related Long-form Insights on IndoPacific.App The LegalTechPolicy.com Playbook, First Edition Learn More 2021 Handbook on AI and International Law [RHB 2021 ISAIL] Learn More Regulatory Sandboxes for Artificial Intelligence: Techno-Legal Approaches for India [ISAIL-TR-002] Learn More Deciphering Artificial Intelligence Hype and its Legal-Economic Risks [VLiGTA-TR-001] Learn More Deciphering Regulative Methods for Generative AI [VLiGTA-TR-002] Learn More Promoting Economy of Innovation through Explainable AI [VLiGTA-TR-003] Learn More Auditing AI Companies for Corporate Internal Investigations in India, VLiGTA-TR-005 Learn More [Version 1] A New Artificial Intelligence Strategy and an Artificial Intelligence (Development & Regulation) Bill, 2023 Learn More [Version 2] Draft Artificial Intelligence (Development & Regulation) Act, 2023 Learn More [AIACT.IN V3] Draft Artificial Intelligence (Development & Regulation) Act, 2023, Version 3 Learn More AIACT.IN Version 3 Quick Explainer Learn More The Legal and Ethical Implications of Monosemanticity in LLMs [IPLR-IG-008] Learn More Navigating Risk and Responsibility in AI-Driven Predictive Maintenance for Spacecraft, IPLR-IG-009, First Edition, 2024 Learn More Impact-Based Legal Problems around Generative AI in Publishing, IPLR-IG-010 Learn More Sections 4-9, AiACT.IN V4 Infographic Explainers Learn More Averting Framework Fatigue in AI Governance [IPLR-IG-013] Learn More [AIACT.IN V4] Draft Artificial Intelligence (Development & Regulation) Act, 2023, Version 4 Learn More [AIACT.IN V5] Draft Artificial Intelligence (Development & Regulation) Act, 2023, Version 5 Learn More Indo-Pacific Research Ethics Framework on Artificial Intelligence Use [IPac AI] Learn More Normative Emergence in Cyber Geographies: International Algorithmic Law in a Multipolar Technological Order, First Edition Learn More AI Bias & the Overlap of AI Diplomacy and Governance Ethics Dilemmas Learn More 2020 Handbook on AI and International Law [RHB 2020 ISAIL] Learn More Previous Term Next Term

  • Sections 4-9, AiACT.IN V4 Infographic Explainers | Indic Pacific | IPLR

    Liked our Work? Search it now on IndoPacific.App Get Searching Our Research Know more about our Knowledge Base, years of accumulated and developed in-house research at Indic Pacific Legal Research. Search our Research Treasure on IndoPacific.App. :) Sections 4-9, AiACT.IN V4 Infographic Explainers Get this Publication 2024 ISBN Not Applicable Author(s) Abhivardhan Editor(s) Not Applicable IndoPacific.App Identifier (ID) AIACTINV4S4-9 Tags ai accountability, AI Act 2023, AI Classification, AI Development, AI Ethics, AI governance, AI Impact, AI policy, AI regulation, AI Risk, ai transparency, aiact.in, Commercial Classification, Conceptual Classification, High-Risk AI Systems, India, Risk-based Classification, Strategic Sectors, Technical Classification, Version 4 Related Terms in Techindata.in Explainers Definitions - A - E AI as a Concept AI as an Object AI as a Subject AI as a Third Party Accountability Definitions - F - J Framework Fatigue General intelligence applications with multiple short-run or unclear use cases as per industrial and regulatory standards (GI2) General intelligence applications with multiple stable use cases as per relevant industrial and regulatory standards (GI1) Generative AI applications with a collection of standalone use cases related to one another (GAI2) Intended Purpose / Specified Purpose Definitions - K - P Manifest Availability Multivariant, Fungible & Disruptive Use Cases & Test Cases of Generative AI Parameters Privacy by Default Privacy by Design Proprietary Information Definitions - Q - U SOTP Classification Technology Transfer Transformer Model Definitions - V - Z Whole-of-Government Response Related Articles in Techindata.in Insights 34 Insight(s) on AI Ethics 9 Insight(s) on AI Governance 8 Insight(s) on AI and Competition Law 8 Insight(s) on AI and Copyright Law 8 Insight(s) on AI and media sciences 8 Insight(s) on AI regulation 8 Insight(s) on AI literacy 5 Insight(s) on AI and Evidence Law 4 Insight(s) on Abhivardhan 2 Insight(s) on AI and Intellectual Property Law 1 Insight(s) on AI and Securities Law 1 Insight(s) on Algorithmic Trading . Previous Item Next Item

  • Our Journey & Achievements | Indic Pacific Legal Research

    We are humbled to present our key achievements & journey at Indic Pacific Legal Research. Journey & Achievements We are proud and delighted to highlight our journey and achievements at the Indic Pacific family, and our knowledge ecosystem. Go to IndoPacific.App We are sure you might be curious about our in-house insights and achievements. Wish to find out? Go to indopacific.app and search "Indic Pacific Legal Research" or the "Indian Society of Artificial Intelligence and Law". Featured in Reinventing the wheel of the india AI story Artificial Intelligence Ethics and International Law, 1st Edition & ISAIL Abhivardhan's first authored book, "Artificial Intelligence Ethics and International Law" was originally published in 2019, inspiring his efforts for laying the foundation of the Indian Society of Artificial Intelligence and Law. Discussing AI as an Entity in Prague Abhivardhan had presented an important paper on the Entitative Nature of Artificial Intelligence in International Law at SOLAIR Conference 2019, a conference jointly organised by the Czech Government and the Czech Academy of Sciences. Indic Pacific & ISAIL, since 2019 Both Indic Pacific Legal Research & the Indian Society of Artificial Intelligence and Law were incorporated in 2019 Abhivardhan's paper published at AIAI 2020 Abhivardhan's one of the most important publication in AI and Law in 2020 include "The Ethos of Artificial Intelligence as a Legal Personality in a Globalized Space: Examining the Overhaul of the Post-Liberal Technological Order The 2020 & 2021 Handbooks on AI and International Law The 2020 & 2021 Handbooks on AI and International Law were published by the Indian Society of Artificial Intelligence and Law, marking the release of two key flagship publications by ISAIL encompassing around 40+ different international legal domains on the impact of AI across legal domains. The IndoPacific.App was launched in 2023 The digital library section of the IndoPacific App was launched (earlier known as the VLiGTA® App) was launched in 2023. India's inaugural artificial intelligence regulation proposal, AIACT.IN Abhivardhan has drafted India's first privately proposed AI regulation bill for India / Bharat to promote a democratic and inclusive discourse about AI standardisation & regulation in India. Artificial Intelligence Ethics and International Law, 2nd Edition (2024) was published in November 2023 Abhivardhan's first book, "Artificial Intelligence Ethics and International Law" was revisited with a 2nd edition and was presented to experts and stalwarts including Arvind Subramaniyam, Intel (formerly), T Koshy, MD, ONDC, Dr Vivek Lall, General Atomics and others. Abhivardhan contributed to a key GenAI + FinTech Moot Proposition for Responsible AI Education among Law Students Abhivardhan was felicitated by Justice Hemant Gupta (Retd.) as the author of a GenAI + Fintech Moot Proposition to promote legal education on Responsible & Explainable AI-related legal disputes. The Moot Proposition can also be accessed at vligta.app. The 2020 Handbook on AI and International Law is recognised by the Council of Europe The Council of Europe has listed the 2020 Handbook on AI and International Law, one of the leading AI and International Law publications by Indian Society of Artificial Intelligence and Law as the only Indian AI initiative on their website, apart from the NITI Aayog's 2018 National Strategy on Artificial Intelligence. Abhivardhan at Startup20 (G20 Brazil 2024) Engagement Group Session Abhivardhan was invited to provide insights on the effective implementation of various National AI Strategies to the Startup20 Brazil Engagement Group, as a part of G20 Brazil (2024) The year 2018 marked a significant milestone for India, as the nation embarked on a transformative journey in the realm of artificial intelligence. The NITI Aayog's National Strategy for Artificial Intelligence (2018) unveiled a promising vision for billions of Indians , while the tabling of the Data Protection Bill in the Indian Parliament signalled a commitment to safeguarding citizens' rights in the digital age. These developments, following the landmark Right to Privacy judgment (Puttaswamy I) and the Aadhar Act judgment (Puttaswamy II), set the stage for a new era of technological advancement and legal innovation in the country. On a global scale, AI was already making remarkable strides, with its pace of evolution accelerating at an unprecedented rate. The hype surrounding the rise of digital technologies like AI was palpable, as the world began to recognize the immense potential they held for transforming various aspects of our lives. Amidst this exciting landscape, our Founder, Abhivardhan, was honored to contribute to the growing body of knowledge in the field. His work, "Artificial Intelligence Ethics and International Law , " published in mid-2019, aimed to shed light on the ethical and legal implications of AI on a global scale. Additionally, his engagement to speak at the SOLAIR Conference on the "Entitative Nature of Artificial Intelligence in International Law , " jointly conducted by the Czech Government and the Czech Academy of Sciences, further underscored the importance of his research efforts. The critical appreciation and recognition of Abhivardhan's early research in AI and Law, at a time when these topics were not yet at the forefront of the Indian policy landscape, served as a catalyst for his vision. Inspired by the potential to make a meaningful impact, he laid the foundation for Indic Pacific Legal Research and the Indian Society of Artificial Intelligence and Law (ISAIL) in mid and late 2019. While Indic Pacific Legal Research focused on providing valuable consulting services, ISAIL became the embodiment of Abhivardhan's unwavering commitment to legal innovation and research in the field of AI. Despite the challenges posed by the COVID-19 pandemic, both organizations have not only survived but have continued to make significant strides in their respective domains. This page thereby serves as a humble testament to the key achievements and milestones that have shaped the journey of Indic Pacific Legal Research and ISAIL. It is a celebration of the tireless efforts, dedication, and vision of Abhivardhan and the teams behind these organisations. Through their work, they have not only contributed to the advancement of AI and law in India but have also inspired a new generation of researchers and innovators to push the boundaries of what is possible. As we reflect on the past and look towards the future, we remain hopeful and optimistic about the potential for AI and law to drive positive change in our society. The journey of Indic Pacific Legal Research and ISAIL serves as a reminder that with passion, perseverance, and a commitment to excellence, we can overcome challenges and make a lasting impact in the world. Our Brands Unique Perspectives, Common Goals: Showcasing Our Law & Policy Products & Brands A digital library and ecosystem app, which offers a skill testing experience in law & policy domains India's inaugural private AI regulation bill for India / Bharat authored by Abhivardhan An independent industry forum for legal, policy & technology professionals which supports the AI ecosystem of start-ups and MSMEs to advocate and promote AI standardisation in India An interactive glossary of key terms used in domains such as technology law, artificial intelligence governance and law & policy in our in-house insights A digital publication network featuring industry-conscious insights by Indic Pacific Legal Research A pioneering platform dedicated to the development and dissemination of AI standardization guidelines by the Indian Society of Artificial Intelligence and Law

  • Strategic Autonomy | Glossary of Terms | Indic Pacific | IPLR

    Strategic Autonomy Date of Addition 26 April 2024 Strategic autonomy in Indian foreign policy is the ability of India to pursue its national interests and adopt its preferred foreign policy without being beholden to any other country. This means that India should be able to make its own decisions about foreign policy, even if those decisions are unpopular with other countries. India should also be able to maintain its own security and economic interests, without having to rely on other countries for help. This idea was discussed in India-led Global Governance in the Indo-Pacific: Basis & Approaches, GLA-TR-003 (2022). Related Long-form Insights on IndoPacific.App 2021 Handbook on AI and International Law [RHB 2021 ISAIL] Learn More Global Customary International Law Index: A Prologue [GLA-TR-00X] Learn More India-led Global Governance in the Indo-Pacific: Basis & Approaches [GLA-TR-003] Learn More Regulatory Sovereignty in India: Indigenizing Competition-Technology Approaches [ISAIL-TR-001] Learn More Global Legalism, Volume 1 Learn More Global Relations and Legal Policy, Volume 1 [GRLP1] Learn More South Asian Review of International Law, Volume 1 Learn More Indian International Law Series, Volume 1 Learn More Global Relations and Legal Policy, Volume 2 Learn More Deciphering Artificial Intelligence Hype and its Legal-Economic Risks [VLiGTA-TR-001] Learn More The Policy Purpose of a Multipolar Agenda for India, First Edition, 2023 Learn More Paving the Path to an International Model Law on Carbon Taxes [IPLR-IG-012] Learn More Normative Emergence in Cyber Geographies: International Algorithmic Law in a Multipolar Technological Order, First Edition Learn More AI Bias & the Overlap of AI Diplomacy and Governance Ethics Dilemmas Learn More 2020 Handbook on AI and International Law [RHB 2020 ISAIL] Learn More Previous Term Next Term The Indic Pacific Glossary The Complete Glossary terms of use This glossary of terms is provided as a free resource for educational and informational purposes only. By using this glossary developed by Indic Pacific Legal Research LLP (referred to as 'The Firm'), you agree to the following terms of use: You may use the glossary for personal and non-commercial purposes only. If you use any content from the glossary of terms on this website in your own work, you must properly attribute the source. This means including a link to this website and citing the title of the glossary. Here is a sample format to cite this glossary (we have used the OSCOLA citation format as an example): Indic Pacific Legal Research LLP, 'TechinData.in Explainers' (Indic Pacific Legal Research , 2023) You are not authorised to reproduce, distribute, or modify the glossary without the express written permission of a representative of Indic Pacific Legal Research. The Firm makes no representations or warranties about the accuracy or completeness of the glossary. The glossary is provided on an "as is" basis and the Firm disclaims all liability for any errors or omissions in the glossary. You agree to indemnify and hold the Firm harmless from any claims or damages arising out of your use of the glossary. If you have any questions or concerns about these terms of use, please contact us at global@indicpacific.com

  • Arijit Singh v. Codible Ventures LLP & Ors., COM IPR SUIT (L) No. 23443 of 2024, Bombay High Court, Judgment dated July 26, 2024 | Indic Pacific | IPLR | indicpacific.com

    Bombay High Court July 2024 landmark judgment granting interim injunction against unauthorized AI voice cloning of renowned singer's vocal identity. Arijit Singh v. Codible Ventures LLP & Ors., COM IPR SUIT (L) No. 23443 of 2024, Bombay High Court, Judgment dated July 26, 2024 Bombay High Court July 2024 landmark judgment granting interim injunction against unauthorized AI voice cloning of renowned singer's vocal identity. Previous Next The AIACT.IN India AI Regulation Tracker This is a simple regulatory tracker consisting all information on how India is regulating artificial intelligence as a technology, inspired from a seminal paper authored by Abhivardhan and Deepanshu Singh for the Forum of Federations, Canada, entitled, "Government with Algorithms: Managing AI in India’s Federal System – Number 70 ". We have also included case laws along with regulatory / governance documents, and avoided adding any industry documents or policy papers which do not reflect any direct or implicit legal impact. July 2024 Read the Document Issuing Authority Bombay High Court Type of Legal / Policy Document Judicial Pronouncements - National Court Precedents Status In Force Regulatory Stage Regulatory Binding Value Legally binding instruments enforceable before courts AIACT. Regulation Visualiser Find more sources Related Long-form Insights on IndoPacific.App Regularizing Artificial Intelligence Ethics in the Indo-Pacific [GLA-TR-002] Learn More Impact-Based Legal Problems around Generative AI in Publishing, IPLR-IG-010 Learn More Indo-Pacific Research Ethics Framework on Artificial Intelligence Use [IPac AI] Learn More The Global AI Inventorship Handbook, First Edition [RHB-AI-INVENT-001-2025] Learn More Related draft AI Law Provisions of aiact.in Section 21 – Intellectual Property Protections Section 21 – Intellectual Property Protections

  • Prompt Injection | Glossary of Terms | Indic Pacific | IPLR

    Prompt Injection Date of Addition 17 October 2025 A security vulnerability classified as the #1 OWASP risk for LLMs where malicious user inputs override system instructions and safety guardrails through carefully crafted natural language commands. This attack vector exploits the fundamental inability of language models to distinguish between system-level instructions and user-provided content, enabling adversaries to manipulate model behavior, extract sensitive information, or bypass ethical constraints. Prompt injection represents a critical socio-technical challenge distinct from traditional cybersecurity vulnerabilities because it operates through semantic manipulation rather than code exploitation. Related Long-form Insights on IndoPacific.App NIST Adversarial Machine Learning Taxonomies: Decoded, IPLR-IG-016 Learn More Previous Term Next Term The Indic Pacific Glossary The Complete Glossary terms of use This glossary of terms is provided as a free resource for educational and informational purposes only. By using this glossary developed by Indic Pacific Legal Research LLP (referred to as 'The Firm'), you agree to the following terms of use: You may use the glossary for personal and non-commercial purposes only. If you use any content from the glossary of terms on this website in your own work, you must properly attribute the source. This means including a link to this website and citing the title of the glossary. Here is a sample format to cite this glossary (we have used the OSCOLA citation format as an example): Indic Pacific Legal Research LLP, 'TechinData.in Explainers' (Indic Pacific Legal Research , 2023) You are not authorised to reproduce, distribute, or modify the glossary without the express written permission of a representative of Indic Pacific Legal Research. The Firm makes no representations or warranties about the accuracy or completeness of the glossary. The glossary is provided on an "as is" basis and the Firm disclaims all liability for any errors or omissions in the glossary. You agree to indemnify and hold the Firm harmless from any claims or damages arising out of your use of the glossary. If you have any questions or concerns about these terms of use, please contact us at global@indicpacific.com

  • India AI Governance Guidelines: Enabling Safe and Trusted AI Innovation | Indic Pacific | IPLR | indicpacific.com

    Released in July 2025 by a drafting committee constituted by MeitY, chaired by Prof. Balaraman Ravindran (IIT Madras), this document provides recommendations that include establishing an AI Governance Group (AIGG) for policy coordination, a Technology & Policy Expert Committee (TPEC) for expert advice, and empowering the AI Safety Institute (AISI) for technical validation and safety research. The guidelines advocate a "whole of government" approach with sectoral regulators maintaining enforcement powers. India AI Governance Guidelines: Enabling Safe and Trusted AI Innovation Released in July 2025 by a drafting committee constituted by MeitY, chaired by Prof. Balaraman Ravindran (IIT Madras), this document provides recommendations that include establishing an AI Governance Group (AIGG) for policy coordination, a Technology & Policy Expert Committee (TPEC) for expert advice, and empowering the AI Safety Institute (AISI) for technical validation and safety research. The guidelines advocate a "whole of government" approach with sectoral regulators maintaining enforcement powers. Previous Next The AIACT.IN India AI Regulation Tracker This is a simple regulatory tracker consisting all information on how India is regulating artificial intelligence as a technology, inspired from a seminal paper authored by Abhivardhan and Deepanshu Singh for the Forum of Federations, Canada, entitled, "Government with Algorithms: Managing AI in India’s Federal System – Number 70 ". We have also included case laws along with regulatory / governance documents, and avoided adding any industry documents or policy papers which do not reflect any direct or implicit legal impact. November 2025 Read the Document Issuing Authority Ministry of Electronics and Information Technology (MeitY) Type of Legal / Policy Document Guidance documents with normative influence Status Enacted Regulatory Stage Pre-regulatory Binding Value Guidance documents with normative influence AIACT. Regulation Visualiser Find more sources Related Long-form Insights on IndoPacific.App The LegalTechPolicy.com Playbook, First Edition Learn More Reimaging and Restructuring MeiTY for India [IPLR-IG-007] Learn More Averting Framework Fatigue in AI Governance [IPLR-IG-013] Learn More Decoding the AI Competency Triad for Public Officials [IPLR-IG-014] Learn More NIST Adversarial Machine Learning Taxonomies: Decoded, IPLR-IG-016 Learn More AI Bias & the Overlap of AI Diplomacy and Governance Ethics Dilemmas Learn More Artificial Intelligence, Market Power and India in a Multipolar World Learn More Related draft AI Law Provisions of aiact.in Section 10 – Composition and Functions of the Council Section 10 – Composition and Functions of the Council Section 15 – Guidance Principles for AI-related Agreements Section 15 – Guidance Principles for AI-related Agreements Section 16 – Guidance Principles for AI-related Corporate Governance Section 16 – Guidance Principles for AI-related Corporate Governance Section 17 – Post-Deployment Monitoring of High-Risk AI Systems Section 17 – Post-Deployment Monitoring of High-Risk AI Systems

  • Strategic Hedging | Glossary of Terms | Indic Pacific | IPLR

    Strategic Hedging Date of Addition 26 April 2024 Strategic hedging means a state spreads its risk by pursuing two opposite policies towards other countries via balancing and engagement, to prepare for all best and worst case scenarios, with a calculated combination of its soft power & hard power. This idea was discussed in India-led Global Governance in the Indo-Pacific: Basis & Approaches, GLA-TR-003 (2022). Related Long-form Insights on IndoPacific.App Global Customary International Law Index: A Prologue [GLA-TR-00X] Learn More An Indian Perspective on Special Purpose Acquisition Companies [GLA-TR-001] Learn More India-led Global Governance in the Indo-Pacific: Basis & Approaches [GLA-TR-003] Learn More Regulatory Sovereignty in India: Indigenizing Competition-Technology Approaches [ISAIL-TR-001] Learn More Global Legalism, Volume 1 Learn More Global Relations and Legal Policy, Volume 1 [GRLP1] Learn More South Asian Review of International Law, Volume 1 Learn More Indian International Law Series, Volume 1 Learn More Global Relations and Legal Policy, Volume 2 Learn More The Policy Purpose of a Multipolar Agenda for India, First Edition, 2023 Learn More Reckoning the Viability of Safe Harbour in Technology Law, IPLR-IG-015 Learn More Normative Emergence in Cyber Geographies: International Algorithmic Law in a Multipolar Technological Order, First Edition Learn More AI Bias & the Overlap of AI Diplomacy and Governance Ethics Dilemmas Learn More Previous Term Next Term The Indic Pacific Glossary The Complete Glossary terms of use This glossary of terms is provided as a free resource for educational and informational purposes only. By using this glossary developed by Indic Pacific Legal Research LLP (referred to as 'The Firm'), you agree to the following terms of use: You may use the glossary for personal and non-commercial purposes only. If you use any content from the glossary of terms on this website in your own work, you must properly attribute the source. This means including a link to this website and citing the title of the glossary. Here is a sample format to cite this glossary (we have used the OSCOLA citation format as an example): Indic Pacific Legal Research LLP, 'TechinData.in Explainers' (Indic Pacific Legal Research , 2023) You are not authorised to reproduce, distribute, or modify the glossary without the express written permission of a representative of Indic Pacific Legal Research. The Firm makes no representations or warranties about the accuracy or completeness of the glossary. The glossary is provided on an "as is" basis and the Firm disclaims all liability for any errors or omissions in the glossary. You agree to indemnify and hold the Firm harmless from any claims or damages arising out of your use of the glossary. If you have any questions or concerns about these terms of use, please contact us at global@indicpacific.com

  • Token Economics | Glossary of Terms | Indic Pacific | IPLR

    Token Economics Date of Addition 17 October 2025 The cost-performance analysis framework governing enterprise LLM deployment decisions based on the computational expense of processing input and output tokens, measured in tokens per dollar and tokens per second. Token economics encompasses tradeoffs between model size, context window length, inference latency, throughput requirements, and operational budgets that determine architectural choices between proprietary APIs versus self-hosted models. This economic calculus has emerged as a primary driver of SLM adoption, prompt optimization practices, and hybrid deployment strategies as organizations confront the reality that serving costs often exceed training expenses. Related Long-form Insights on IndoPacific.App Deciphering Artificial Intelligence Hype and its Legal-Economic Risks [VLiGTA-TR-001] Learn More Promoting Economy of Innovation through Explainable AI [VLiGTA-TR-003] Learn More Legal-Economic Issues in Indian AI Compute and Infrastructure, IPLR-IG-011 Learn More Artificial Intelligence, Market Power and India in a Multipolar World Learn More Previous Term Next Term The Indic Pacific Glossary The Complete Glossary terms of use This glossary of terms is provided as a free resource for educational and informational purposes only. By using this glossary developed by Indic Pacific Legal Research LLP (referred to as 'The Firm'), you agree to the following terms of use: You may use the glossary for personal and non-commercial purposes only. If you use any content from the glossary of terms on this website in your own work, you must properly attribute the source. This means including a link to this website and citing the title of the glossary. Here is a sample format to cite this glossary (we have used the OSCOLA citation format as an example): Indic Pacific Legal Research LLP, 'TechinData.in Explainers' (Indic Pacific Legal Research , 2023) You are not authorised to reproduce, distribute, or modify the glossary without the express written permission of a representative of Indic Pacific Legal Research. The Firm makes no representations or warranties about the accuracy or completeness of the glossary. The glossary is provided on an "as is" basis and the Firm disclaims all liability for any errors or omissions in the glossary. You agree to indemnify and hold the Firm harmless from any claims or damages arising out of your use of the glossary. If you have any questions or concerns about these terms of use, please contact us at global@indicpacific.com

  • Averting Framework Fatigue in AI Governance [IPLR-IG-013] | Indic Pacific | IPLR

    Liked our Work? Search it now on IndoPacific.App Get Searching Our Research Know more about our Knowledge Base, years of accumulated and developed in-house research at Indic Pacific Legal Research. Search our Research Treasure on IndoPacific.App. :) Averting Framework Fatigue in AI Governance [IPLR-IG-013] Get this Publication 2025 ISBN 978-81-977227-5-2 Author(s) Abhivardhan Editor(s) Not Applicable IndoPacific.App Identifier (ID) IPLR-IG-013 Tags Abhivardhan, AI Ethics, AI ethics training, AI governance, AI governance compliance, AI governance models, AI governance tools, AI governance training, AI policy developments, AI policy timeline (2023-2025), Algorithmic accountability, collaborative policymaking, compliance challenges, compliance roadmaps, corporate governance, decision paralysis, dynamic governance, ethical AI frameworks, ethical compliance, ethical decision-making, ethical governance strategies, ethical guidelines, framework fatigue, framework integration, framework optimization, framework proliferation, framework simplification., governance best practices, governance challenges, governance clarity, governance exercises, governance frameworks, governance priorities, governance roadmaps, governance strategies, Hyderabad workshop 2025, industry standards, legal frameworks, multijurisdictional frameworks, operational alignment, policy fragmentation, policy harmonization, policy implementation, policy overload, prioritization models, RBI FREE-AI Committee, regulatory alignment, regulatory compliance, risk mitigation, stakeholder alignment, stakeholder engagement, strategic prioritization, technical standards Related Terms in Techindata.in Explainers Definitions - A - E AI as an Industry AI Literacy Benchmark Gaming Data as Noise Distributed Ledger Digital Colony Risk Ease of Disposing Disputes (EoDD) Definitions - F - J Framework Fatigue General intelligence applications with multiple short-run or unclear use cases as per industrial and regulatory standards (GI2) Generative AI applications with a collection of standalone use cases related to one another (GAI2) Intended Purpose / Specified Purpose Jurisprudential Compression Tax International Algorithmic Law Issue-to-issue concept classification Definitions - K - P Klarna Effect Language Model Model Algorithmic Ethics standards (MAES) Multivariant, Fungible & Disruptive Use Cases & Test Cases of Generative AI Neurosymbolic AI Object-Oriented Design Omnipotence Omnipresence Parameters Performance Effect Phenomena-based concept classification Definitions - Q - U Roughdraft AI SOTP Classification Semi-Supervised Learning Synthetic Confidence Technical concept classifcation Technology by Default Technology by Design Technology Distancing Technology Transfer Technophobia Definitions - V - Z WENA Whole-of-Government Response Related Articles in Techindata.in Insights 26 Insight(s) on artificial intelligence and law 13 Insight(s) on artificial intelligence ethics 12 Insight(s) on artificial intelligence hype 9 Insight(s) on AI Governance 8 Insight(s) on AI literacy 7 Insight(s) on RBI FREE-AI Committee 1 Insight(s) on deepfakes 1 Insight(s) on IndiaAI 1 Insight(s) on responsibility 0 Insight(s) on RoughDraft AI . Previous Item Next Item

  • India AI Readiness Assessment Report | Indic Pacific | IPLR | indicpacific.com

    Research and assessment report jointly published by UNESCO and the Ministry of Electronics and Information Technology (MeitY) evaluating India's infrastructural and policy preparedness for AI. India AI Readiness Assessment Report Research and assessment report jointly published by UNESCO and the Ministry of Electronics and Information Technology (MeitY) evaluating India's infrastructural and policy preparedness for AI. Previous Next The AIACT.IN India AI Regulation Tracker This is a simple regulatory tracker consisting all information on how India is regulating artificial intelligence as a technology, inspired from a seminal paper authored by Abhivardhan and Deepanshu Singh for the Forum of Federations, Canada, entitled, "Government with Algorithms: Managing AI in India’s Federal System – Number 70 ". We have also included case laws along with regulatory / governance documents, and avoided adding any industry documents or policy papers which do not reflect any direct or implicit legal impact. February 2026 Read the Document Issuing Authority UNESCO Type of Legal / Policy Document Research / Assessment Report Status Published Regulatory Stage Pre-regulatory Binding Value Guidance documents with normative influence AIACT. Regulation Visualiser Find more sources Related Long-form Insights on IndoPacific.App The LegalTechPolicy.com Playbook, First Edition Learn More Reimaging and Restructuring MeiTY for India [IPLR-IG-007] Learn More Averting Framework Fatigue in AI Governance [IPLR-IG-013] Learn More Decoding the AI Competency Triad for Public Officials [IPLR-IG-014] Learn More NIST Adversarial Machine Learning Taxonomies: Decoded, IPLR-IG-016 Learn More AI Bias & the Overlap of AI Diplomacy and Governance Ethics Dilemmas Learn More Artificial Intelligence, Market Power and India in a Multipolar World Learn More Related draft AI Law Provisions of aiact.in Section 10 – Composition and Functions of the Council Section 10 – Composition and Functions of the Council Section 15 – Guidance Principles for AI-related Agreements Section 15 – Guidance Principles for AI-related Agreements Section 16 – Guidance Principles for AI-related Corporate Governance Section 16 – Guidance Principles for AI-related Corporate Governance Section 17 – Post-Deployment Monitoring of High-Risk AI Systems Section 17 – Post-Deployment Monitoring of High-Risk AI Systems

bottom of page